Fire separation distance is an effective measure to prevent fire spreading and reduce fire loss.The small fire separation distance is less effective and the large one is unnecessarily redundant.Setting rational fire separation distance is of practical significance.Cost-benefit analysis of fire separation distance and quantitative method on cost and benefit are introduced in the paper, based on which, and taking a liquefied petroleum gas station as an example, the best fire separation distance with maximum net contribution is obtained through the cost-benefit analysis and specific quantitative calculation.This paper offers guidance for setting reasonable fire separation distance and reducing its costs.
XIA Chang-tian, NIU Gui-lai
. The determination of the best fire separation distance based on cost-benefit analysis[J]. Journal of Shenyang Aerospace University, 2013
, 30(4)
: 79
-83
.
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1248.2013.04.016
[1]孙金华, 褚冠全, 刘小勇.火灾风险评估方法学[M].北京:科学出版社, 2008.
[2]田玉敏.消防经济学[M].北京:化学工业出版社, 2010.
[3]任松发.火灾调查[M].北京:警官教育出版社, 1998.
[4]Cross FB.Facts and values in risk assessment[J].Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 1998(59):27-40.
[5]Martin Kylefors.Cost-benefit analysis of separation distances - a utility-based approach to risk management decision-making[D].Sweden:Lund University, 2001.
[6]陶善菊, 陈广钊, 陈艳, 等.液化石油气储罐设计风险评估分析[J].广州化工, 2011(13):201-203.
[7]张瑞华.液化石油气储罐火灾爆炸模拟评价方法研究[J].消防科学与技术, 2004(3):8-10.
[8]甫兵.液化石油气储罐的危险性定量模拟及事故预防[J].内蒙古石油化工, 2011(1):62-63.
[9]H R Greenberg, J J Cramer.Risk assessment and risk management for the chemical process industry[J].Van Nostr and Reinhold, 1991(2):4-8.
[10]W E Baker.Explosion hazards and evaluation[J].Elsevier.1983(4):31-34.
[11]程中林.液化石油气罐区火灾爆炸分析与评价[J].安徽化工, 2004(1):46-48.
