机械工程

模型故障诊断法在飞机液压能源系统中的应用

展开
  • 1.沈阳飞机设计研究所 综合后勤保障部, 沈阳 110035;
    2.沈阳航空航天大学 自动化学院, 沈阳 110136
刘东(1977-), 男, 辽宁本溪人, 高级工程师, 主要研究方向:飞机测试性、保障性设计研究, E-mail:flashnjstar@163.com。

收稿日期: 2012-06-15

基金资助

航空科学基金(项目编号:2010ZD54012)

Application of model-based diagnosis to aircraft hydraulic power system

Expand
  • 1.Department of Integrated Logistics Support, Shenyang Aircraft Design & Research Institute, Shenyang 110035;
    2.College of Automation, Shenyang Aerospace University, Shenyang 110136

Received date: 2012-06-15

摘要

针对飞机液压能源系统的故障诊断问题, 介绍了基于模型的故障诊断方法。基于飞机液压能源系统的结构和行为, 分析了系统各组件的行为模式及组件之间的拓扑结构。利用面向对象的建模语言Rodelica建立各组件的行为模型, 进而搭建系统的行为模型。将行为模型的预测值与实际系统的观测值的偏差作为诊断推理引擎的输入, 实现了液压能源系统的故障诊断, 得出常见故障现象的诊断决策树。诊断结果表明, 所建立的飞机液压能源系统的行为模型是准确可靠的, 所得诊断结果能有效地定位故障并确定故障组件的状态, 具有工程实用性。

本文引用格式

刘东, 安云哲, 崔建国, 谭峰 . 模型故障诊断法在飞机液压能源系统中的应用[J]. 沈阳航空航天大学学报, 2013 , 30(1) : 51 -56 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1248.2013.01.012

Abstract

Aimed at the fault diagnosis of the aircraft hydraulic power system, model-based diagnosis was introduced. On the basis of the architecture and behavior of the hydraulic power system, the paper analyzes behavioral modes of components and topological structure between the components. Using the object-oriented modeling language Rodelica, behavioral models of different components were established, and the behavioral model of hydraulic power system was built. The deviation between predicted data of the behavioral model and observed data of the real system is taken as input of diagnostic reasoning engine. Then the fault diagnosis of the hydraulic power system was achieved, and diagnostic decision trees of common fault diagnosis were obtained. Diagnostic results show that the behavioral model of the aircraft hydraulic power system was accurate, which could effectively locate the faulty components and identify their working condition. It is validated that the methodology is useful in engineering application.

参考文献

[1]邵继业.基于模型的故障诊断方法研究及在航天中的应用[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学, 2009.
[2]李伟.复杂系统的智能故障诊断技术现状及其发展趋势[J].计算机仿真, 2004, 21(10):4-7.
[3]Peter Bunus, Karin Lunde.Supporting model based diagnostics with equation-based object oriented languages[C].2nd International Workshop on Equation-Based Object-Oriented Languages and Tools, Paphos, Cyprus, 2008.
[4]Davis R.Diagnostic reasoning based on structure and behavior[J].Artificial Intelligence, 1984, 24(1-3):347-410.
[5]Reiter R.A theory of diagnosis from first principles[J].Artificial intelligence, 1987, 32(1):57-96.
[6]Johan de Kleer, Williams BC.Diagnosing multiple faults[J].Artificial Intelligence, 1987, 32(1):97-130.
[7]Hofbaur MW, Williams BC.Hybrid estimation of complex systems[J].IEEE Transactions on system, Man and Cybernetics B:Cybernetics, 2004, 34(5):2178-2191.
[8]Hofbaur MW, Williams BC.Hybrid diagnosis with unknown behavioral modes[C].Proceedings of the 13th International Workshop on Principles of Diagnosis (DX02), 2002.
[9]Williams B C, Nayak P P.A model-based approach to reactie self-configuring system[C].Procceeding of AAAI-96.1996.
[10]Bajwa A, Sweet A.The Livingstone model of a main propulsion system[C].Proceedings of the IEEE, 2003.
[11]欧阳丹彤, 欧阳继红, 刘大有.基于模型诊断的研究与新进展[J].吉林大学自然科学学报, 2001(2):38-46.
[12]Johan de Kleer, James Kurien.Fundamentals of model-based Diagnosis[C].IFAC Symposium Safeprocess, Washington USA, June, 2003.
[13]Karin Lunde.Object-oriented modeling in model-based diagnosis[C].In Proceedings of Modelica Workshop, Lund, Sweden, 2000.
文章导航

/