赵维涛(1977-),男,辽宁沈阳人,教授,博士,主要研究方向:结构可靠性,E-mial: zhwt201@126.com。 |
收稿日期: 2023-08-24
网络出版日期: 2024-02-05
基金资助
国家自然科学基金(12272240)
Reliability evaluation of parallel repairable systems based on load-sharing
Received date: 2023-08-24
Online published: 2024-02-05
在航空航天等要求高可靠性的系统中,通常采用并联形式来提高系统的可靠性。当并联系统中某个元件失效后,由于负载重新分配,导致剩余正常元件的工作环境劣化。针对这一问题,建立基于载荷共享的并联可修复系统可靠性评估模型既适用于元件故障率相同又适用于元件故障率不同的并联可修复系统。当载荷共享因子取值为1时,该模型可退化为传统马尔可夫模型。算例结果表明,文中方法和传统方法求得的系统瞬态可用度变化趋势相同;相比传统方法的评估结果,当考虑载荷共享时系统的稳态可用度减小幅度不大,而平均故障间隔时间(mean time between failure,MTBF)将大幅减小。因此,利用传统马尔可夫模型给出的MTBF来衡量系统可靠性以及确定维修间隔需慎重。
赵维涛 , 贾路兵 . 基于载荷共享的并联可修复系统可靠性评估[J]. 沈阳航空航天大学学报, 2023 , 40(6) : 1 -7 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1248.2023.06.001
In systems such as aerospace with high-reliability requirements, parallel forms were often used in engineering to improve system reliability. When a component in the parallel system fails, the working environment of the remaining normal components deteriorates due to the load redistribution. In order to solve this problem,a reliability evaluation model of the parallel repairable system based on load-sharing was established. The model was suitable for parallel repairable systems with the same and different component failure rates. When the load-sharing factor was one, the model will be degenerated into the traditional Markov model. The numerical results show that the variation trend of transient avai-lability obtained by the proposed and traditional method is same. Compared to the results evaluated by traditional methods, the reduction in steady-state availability of the system is not huge when considering load-sharing, while the MTBF will decrease significantly. Therefore, it should be cautious to use MTBF obtained by the traditional Markov model to measure system reliability and determine maintenance intervals.
Key words: reliability evaluation; parallel system; Markov; load-sharing; availability; MTBF
1 |
曹晋华,程侃.可靠性数学引论:修订版[M].北京:高等教育出版社, 2006.
|
2 |
梁丽丹,张民悦.具有优先修理权的三个不同部件并联系统的可靠性分析[J].兰州交通大学学报, 2011, 30(4):139-144.
|
3 |
杨云生,魏国东,柴凯,等.基于马尔可夫过程的舰船装备可用度分析[J].海军工程大学学报, 2022, 34(4): 13-19.
|
4 |
张振友,郭强,黄立坡,等.基于马尔可夫过程的武器系统相关失效分析[J].火力与指挥控制, 2012, 37(7):117-119.
|
5 |
|
6 |
|
7 |
|
8 |
冯蕴雯,唐家强,冯成慧,等.基于载荷共享理论的多传力路径耳片可靠性研究[J].航空学报,2023,44(2):264-275.
|
9 |
|
10 |
张婧,唐应辉.负载分担下可修并联系统的可靠性分析[J].电子科技大学学报, 2007,36(S1):401- 403.
|
11 |
|
12 |
|
13 |
|
14 |
王琦. 基于马尔可夫过程的耦合级联失效系统可靠性与安全性分析[D].北京:中央民族大学, 2023.
|
15 |
佛显超,谢红卫.不同单元组成的并联系统的可用度分析[J].上海海运学院学报, 2001,22(3):187- 189.
|
16 |
尹东亮,黎放,陈童. 基于PH分布的两部件并联系统可靠性模型分析[J].工程设计学报, 2016,23(2):130-135.
|
17 |
李守仁,袁海蓉.确定不同单元并联系统可靠性的马尔可夫过程[J].哈尔滨工程大学学报, 2003,24(1): 90-93.
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |