[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]Journal of Shenyang Aerospace University >
The impact of supply chain concentration on corporate risk-taking
Received date: 2024-10-23
Revised date: 2024-12-06
Accepted date: 2024-12-07
Online published: 2026-03-12
Civil-military integration enterprises serve as core carriers for constructing an integrated national strategic system and capabilities,and enhancing their risk-taking capacity is critically significant for advancing the civil-military integration development strategy. Taking this as the point of departure, which aims to explore the relationship between supply chain concentration and risk-taking capacity, thereby providing theoretical and practical support for the further advancement of the civil-military integration development strategy. The empirical analysis of the listed civil-military integration enterprises in Shanghai and Shenzhen A-shares from 2015 to 2023 finds that: supply chain concentration can improve the risk-taking level of civil-military integration enterprises, and digital transformation plays a positive moderating role in the relationship between the two; secondly, supply chain concentration can improve the level of risk-taking by alleviating corporate financing constraints and reducing information asymmetry; furthermore, supply chain concentration has a more obvious effect on the improvement of risk-taking level of military-to-civil enterprises and large-scale civil-military integration enterprises. The conclusion of the study is that it is of reference significance for civil-military integration enterprises to improve the level of risk-taking through supply chain centralization.
Hao JING , Qinghe TANG , Ning QI . The impact of supply chain concentration on corporate risk-taking[J]. Journal of Shenyang Aerospace University, 2026 , 43(1) : 83 -89 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1248.2026.01.011
| [1] |
尹西明,陈泰伦,陈劲.军民融合创新联合体:内涵、逻辑与进路[J].科技进步与对策,2024,41(4):151-160.
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
古贞,谭清美.军民融合供应链集成化管理研究[J].科技管理研究,2019,39(11):226-235.
|
| [4] |
张济平,李增福.供应链数字化、供应链整合与企业绿色转型[J].华东经济管理,2024,38(11):84-95.
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
何瑛,于文蕾,杨棉之.CEO复合型职业经历、企业风险承担与企业价值[J].中国工业经济,2019(9):155-173.
|
| [7] |
高磊,晓芳,王彦东.多个大股东、风险承担与企业价值[J].南开管理评论,2020,23(5):124-133.
|
| [8] |
张娆,路继业,姬东骅.产业政策能否促进企业风险承担?[J].会计研究,2019(7):3-11.
|
| [9] |
唐跃军.供应商、经销商议价能力与公司业绩:来自2005—2007年中国制造业上市公司的经验证据[J].中国工业经济,2009(10):67-76.
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
王雄元,王鹏,张金萍.客户集中度与审计费用:客户风险抑或供应链整合[J].审计研究,2014(6):72-82.
|
| [13] |
梁雯.供应链集中度与零售企业创新绩效关系探讨:基于内部控制的调节效应[J].商业经济研究,2024(16):25-28.
|
| [14] |
吕可夫,于明洋,阮永平.兼听则明,偏信则暗:供应链网络中心性与企业风险承担[J].管理评论,2023,35(7):266-280.
|
| [15] |
王晓燕,史秀敏,师亚楠.供应商集中度与缓解中小企业融资约束:基于债务融资的中介效应检验[J].金融与经济,2020(12):78-85.
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
李倩.供应链集中对流通企业经营风险的影响:基于风险态度视角[J].商业经济研究,2022(21):37-40.
|
| [18] |
胡雯莉,唐华军.供应链关系对银行借款的影响机制研究:商业信用的中介作用和行业环境的调节效应[J].企业经济,2021,40(3):33-44.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |