[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]Journal of Shenyang Aerospace University >
Evacuation characteristics in Airbus 330 cabin crew under different hatch opening conditions
Received date: 2024-03-22
Online published: 2024-09-10
To study the evacuation characteristics in the Airbus 330 cabin crew under different hatch opening conditions,the Pathfinder software was used to simulate the evacuation characteristics.The evacuation characteristics of personnel were explored in four situations: all cabin doors opened, emergency doors could not be opened, front cabin doors could not be opened, and rear cabin doors could not be opened.The results show that the simulation time for evacuation is 63.3 s when all hatches are open,while 118.3 s when the emergency hatch cannot be opened.The per-unit-time flow of people at No.3,No.4,No.7,and No.8 hatches decreases by 0.09 people,0.2 people 0.09 people,0.04 people respectively.It takes 64s to evacuate people when the front cabin door could not be opened.The number of people evacuated from No.3,No.4,No.5,and No.6 doors are 47,48,52,and 50 respectively,indicating that the failure to open the front cabin door does not have no significant impact on the evacuation time.When the rear cabin door could not be opened,the evacuation time is 112.3s.The time interval from the first person to the last person from the No.3,No.4,No.5 and No.6 doors is 67.7 s,67.6 s,109.9 s and 107.1 s,respectively.This indicates that more passengers in the economy class choose to escape from the hatches No.5 and No.6,which increases the evacuation time.The research results provide a reference for understanding the evacuation characteristics of personnel under different hatch opening conditions.
Tianqi LIU , Kenan LIU . Evacuation characteristics in Airbus 330 cabin crew under different hatch opening conditions[J]. Journal of Shenyang Aerospace University, 2024 , 41(4) : 67 -75 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1248.2024.04.008
1 |
吕伟,汪京辉,李加伟,等.火灾场景下宽体客机人员疏散风险分析[J].中国安全科学学报,2023,33(3):141-146.
|
2 |
杜红兵,张世博,李弘毅,等.火灾场景下民机客舱人员疏散仿真及优化[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2023,19(2):187-194.
|
3 |
陈琨,冯振宇,宋娜.典型民用飞机人员疏散瓶颈规律[J].科学技术与工程,2020,20(31):13053-13060.
|
4 |
杜红兵,胡辉,张世博,等.体质指数变化对民机人员应急疏散的影响研究[J].安全与环境学报,2022,22(6):3326-3332.
|
5 |
田水承,王启睿,陈洋,等.民机客舱中部应急出口对人员疏散的影响[J].科学技术与工程,2020,20(20):8413-8417.
|
6 |
张青松,杨彩红.飞机客舱应急撤离演示模拟方案设计研究[J].安全与环境学报,2016,16(3):154-157.
|
7 |
王涛,刘江虹.某豪华邮轮客舱人员疏散安全性评估[J].消防科学与技术,2020,39(7):1037-1040.
|
8 |
王起全,李登尧,杨鑫刚.地铁事故应急疏散模拟及优化研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2019,15(11):170-178.
|
9 |
姜学鹏,蒲婷,张帆.地铁车站火灾人员疏散可靠度研究[J].安全与环境学报,2021,21(5):2170-2177.
|
10 |
刘栋栋,刘金亮,张远青.基于从众心理影响的交通枢纽人员疏散[J].消防科学与技术,2011,30(10):889-893.
|
11 |
张青松,戚瀚鹏.基于火灾疏散安全指数的飞机客舱防火设计[J].北京航空航天大学学报,2015,41(7):1165-1170.
|
12 |
刘天奇,王宁.飞机隔热隔音超细玻璃纤维棉燃烧火焰蔓延特性[J].工程科学学报,2020,42(12):1647-1652.
|
13 |
刘天奇,蔡之馨,王宁.客机隔热隔声棉点火特性与产烟毒性研究[J].航空动力学报,2021,36(2):377-383.
|
14 |
刘天奇,王宁,蔡之馨,等.AFT250航空电线燃烧毒害气体产物生成特性[J].材料导报,2022,36(1):201-205.
|
15 |
刘天奇.紧急迫降条件下空中客车A320客舱乘客疏散数值模拟[C]// 第十八届沈阳科学学术年会论文集.沈阳:中国石化出版社,2021:597-601.
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |